Kylie Jenner Sued by Second Housekeeper Over Pay Discrimination and Harassment Claims
LOS ANGELES — Kylie Jenner is facing a second lawsuit from a former housekeeper who alleges she endured severe harassment, discrimination and wage violations while working at the reality star's properties, including unpaid work at boyfriend Timothée Chalamet's residence. The complaint, filed April 17, adds to scrutiny of labor practices in high-profile Hollywood households.

Angelica Vasquez worked for Jenner from September 2024 to August 2025 and claims she faced a "toxic and abusive" environment from supervisors and colleagues. The lawsuit, filed in Los Angeles Superior Court against Jenner, Tri Star Services and Maison Family Services, accuses the defendants of national origin and religious discrimination, harassment, retaliation, wrongful termination and multiple California Labor Code violations. Vasquez seeks unpaid wages, overtime, meal and rest period premiums, unreimbursed expenses and punitive damages.
The complaint details alleged hostility from day one, including exclusion and derogatory comments. Vasquez claims she was directed to work at Chalamet's Los Angeles home on multiple occasions without mileage or transportation reimbursement. She also alleges late or incomplete pay, failure to provide proper breaks and retaliation after raising concerns. Jenner is not accused of personally directing the harassment, but the suit holds her responsible as employer.
This marks the second recent housekeeper lawsuit against Jenner. The development comes as the Kardashian-Jenner family faces increased examination of their business and personal practices. Representatives for Jenner have not publicly commented on the latest filing, and the case remains in its early stages.
Vasquez's attorneys argue the allegations reflect systemic issues in domestic work, where employees often lack formal contracts, unions or protections. Domestic workers' advocates say high-net-worth employers sometimes exploit power imbalances, leading to wage theft and hostile environments. The suit cites violations of the California Fair Employment and Housing Act and Labor Code provisions on overtime, reimbursements and record-keeping.
Jenner, 28, built a billion-dollar cosmetics empire and maintains a lavish lifestyle documented on social media and reality television. Her Hidden Hills mansion and other properties require significant staff. The lawsuit provides a rare glimpse behind the scenes of celebrity domestic employment, where confidentiality agreements often silence workers. Vasquez's decision to sue publicly highlights growing willingness among service workers to challenge powerful employers.
Legal experts say such cases rarely reach trial and often settle confidentially. However, the publicity around Jenner could pressure a resolution or force broader changes in how she and similar celebrities manage household staff. California's strong worker protections, including recent expansions for domestic employees, strengthen Vasquez's position. The case could set precedents if it proceeds.
The Jenner family has faced previous labor-related controversies. Past employees have alleged poor conditions or inadequate pay in Kardashian-Jenner ventures, though many claims were resolved privately. This latest suit echoes broader national conversations about wealth inequality and worker rights in the gig and service economy. Domestic work remains one of the least regulated sectors, with many employees classified as independent contractors to limit employer liability.
Advocates for domestic workers' rights have called for stronger enforcement and industry standards. Groups like the National Domestic Workers Alliance push for bills of rights guaranteeing fair pay, overtime, rest periods and protection from harassment. High-profile cases involving celebrities can raise awareness and drive policy changes at the state level.
Jenner's representatives have previously defended her business practices, emphasizing competitive compensation and positive work environments. The family's reality show empire has portrayed close relationships with staff, but lawsuits like Vasquez's challenge that image. Public reaction has been mixed, with some fans defending Jenner and others criticizing perceived hypocrisy given the family's wealth.
The case also touches on Jenner's relationship with Chalamet. Vasquez claims work at his residence added uncompensated travel time and expenses. The couple has been together since 2023 and frequently appears together at high-profile events. While the lawsuit does not accuse Chalamet of wrongdoing, it highlights how intertwined personal and professional lives can complicate employment arrangements.
As the lawsuit proceeds, both sides will likely engage in discovery, with depositions and document requests revealing more about Jenner's household operations. Jenner's legal team is expected to argue that any issues were isolated or handled appropriately through the staffing agencies named as co-defendants. Vasquez's side will push for evidence of systemic problems and failure to address complaints.
The development arrives as Jenner balances motherhood, business ventures and public life. She welcomed her second child with Travis Scott in 2022 and maintains an active role in Kylie Cosmetics. The suit could distract from her professional endeavors, though celebrity legal battles often fade quickly from public memory unless they escalate dramatically.
Labor law attorneys say cases like this underscore the need for clear contracts and transparent policies in private homes. Domestic workers, often immigrants or people of color, face unique vulnerabilities. Vasquez's claims of national origin and religious discrimination, if proven, could trigger significant liability under California law. The case serves as a cautionary tale for affluent employers nationwide.
For now, the allegations remain unproven in court. Jenner has not been personally accused of direct harassment, and the staffing companies may share responsibility. The public will watch closely as the case unfolds, with potential for settlement or trial in the coming months. The outcome could influence how other celebrities manage household staff and whether more workers come forward with similar claims.
© Copyright 2026 IBTimes AU. All rights reserved.























